Chat and Gossip About Professional Darts and The More Farcical Successors To The BDO
-
The Thorn
- Posts: 104391
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2016 5:36 pm
-
Contact:
Post
by The Thorn » Mon Apr 14, 2025 4:25 pm
Emulsfier wrote: ↑Mon Apr 14, 2025 4:03 pm
The Thorn wrote: ↑Mon Apr 14, 2025 4:00 pm
Emulsfier wrote: ↑Mon Apr 14, 2025 3:54 pm
The Thorn wrote: ↑Mon Apr 14, 2025 3:20 pm
ChrisW wrote: ↑Mon Apr 14, 2025 11:44 am
I would say from the list Emuls posted they are all capable of a decent standard.
Sherrock is capable of having a stinker as we saw yesterday.
70 average is good enough
Yes there would be a few below that
They wont avg that on tv and will be lucky to avg 65+
As I said. There would be a few below but you would expect the majority to be 70+
From the series avgs above thats demonstrably not true.
15 out of 16 players have a running average over 70
How does that exactly prove the majority would average under 70
The truth, however ugly in itself, is always curious and beautiful to seekers after it.

-
Emulsfier
- Posts: 36025
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2019 3:08 pm
- Location: Eggmanland
-
Contact:
Post
by Emulsfier » Mon Apr 14, 2025 4:26 pm
The Thorn wrote: ↑Mon Apr 14, 2025 4:25 pm
Emulsfier wrote: ↑Mon Apr 14, 2025 4:03 pm
The Thorn wrote: ↑Mon Apr 14, 2025 4:00 pm
Emulsfier wrote: ↑Mon Apr 14, 2025 3:54 pm
The Thorn wrote: ↑Mon Apr 14, 2025 3:20 pm
70 average is good enough
Yes there would be a few below that
They wont avg that on tv and will be lucky to avg 65+
As I said. There would be a few below but you would expect the majority to be 70+
From the series avgs above thats demonstrably not true.
15 out of 16 players have a running average over 70
How does that exactly prove the majority would average under 70
Because they are worse on tv as i stated.
-
Randall
- Site Admin
- Posts: 208717
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2011 2:59 pm
- Location: On a hill surrounded by Indians (Leicester)
-
Contact:
Post
by Randall » Mon Apr 14, 2025 5:26 pm
Nobody wants to watch people averaging 70
-
The Thorn
- Posts: 104391
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2016 5:36 pm
-
Contact:
Post
by The Thorn » Mon Apr 14, 2025 5:28 pm
Randall wrote: ↑Mon Apr 14, 2025 5:26 pm
Nobody wants to watch people averaging 70
I wouldn't mind
It's short format
The truth, however ugly in itself, is always curious and beautiful to seekers after it.

-
Randall
- Site Admin
- Posts: 208717
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2011 2:59 pm
- Location: On a hill surrounded by Indians (Leicester)
-
Contact:
Post
by Randall » Mon Apr 14, 2025 5:29 pm
The Thorn wrote: ↑Mon Apr 14, 2025 5:28 pm
Randall wrote: ↑Mon Apr 14, 2025 5:26 pm
Nobody wants to watch people averaging 70
I wouldn't mind
It's short format
Would still take a long time
-
The Thorn
- Posts: 104391
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2016 5:36 pm
-
Contact:
Post
by The Thorn » Mon Apr 14, 2025 5:31 pm
Randall wrote: ↑Mon Apr 14, 2025 5:29 pm
The Thorn wrote: ↑Mon Apr 14, 2025 5:28 pm
Randall wrote: ↑Mon Apr 14, 2025 5:26 pm
Nobody wants to watch people averaging 70
I wouldn't mind
It's short format
Would still take a long time
Best of 7 it wouldn't
The truth, however ugly in itself, is always curious and beautiful to seekers after it.

-
Emulsfier
- Posts: 36025
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2019 3:08 pm
- Location: Eggmanland
-
Contact:
Post
by Emulsfier » Mon Apr 14, 2025 5:34 pm
70 is worst of both worlds. Either i want it to be decent, or absolutely diabolical. Not in the middle.
-
The Thorn
- Posts: 104391
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2016 5:36 pm
-
Contact:
Post
by The Thorn » Mon Apr 14, 2025 5:36 pm
Emulsfier wrote: ↑Mon Apr 14, 2025 5:34 pm
70 is worst of both worlds. Either i want it to be decent, or absolutely diabolical. Not in the middle.
Both are possible
Averages would range from low 60s to high 90s
The truth, however ugly in itself, is always curious and beautiful to seekers after it.

Users browsing this forum:
Bing [Bot],
dting05,
Safc and 21 guests