Re: 2020 PDC World Cup of Darts
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2020 5:13 pm
No, it's not.
Darts Forum The Darts Forum Darts Forums Darts PDC Darts BDO Darts Darts Players Darts Fans, Talk About Darts Best Double Finishes Phil Taylor Double Finishes darts forum, dartscorner, darts reviews, darts practice tips, buy darts, swap darts, vintage
https://www.thedartsforum.com/
No, it's not.
The Thorn wrote: ↑Thu Oct 08, 2020 4:08 pmYeah I'm dying to see White, Boulton and Rodent on TV even more. Am I fuck.oche balboa wrote: ↑Thu Oct 08, 2020 3:37 pm Should be a B Side for the top 3 nations
England: Nathan Aspinall & Ian White
Scotland: John Henderson & Andy Boulton
Holland: Jermaine Wattinmena & Jeffrey De Zwann
It's usually unwatchable, especially in the early rounds.
Why combine Scotland and Wales when they both have decent teams?
Even if the standard is usually not that good, the variety and the different countries aspect makes it enjoyable for me. Even if a game is shite, it doesn't drag on for long because of the short format. A pairs tournament would be nice I guess but I don't think it should replace the WC. For most international players, this is their only chance of making their mark aside the Worlds, and in some cases the World Series.sennafan24 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 09, 2020 5:15 pmIt's usually unwatchable, especially in the early rounds.
I would prefer a pairs tournament with just the top 64 players.
I actually think Viz has a point.The Thorn wrote: ↑Fri Oct 09, 2020 5:28 pm Even if the standard is usually not that good, the variety and the different countries aspect makes it enjoyable for me. Even if a game is shite, it doesn't drag on for long because of the short format. A pairs tournament would be nice I guess but I don't think it should replace the WC. For most international players, this is their only chance of making their mark aside the Worlds, and in some cases the World Series.
But trimming the fat is exactly what removes the actual point of the event here. It would turn out to be the usual PDC tournament with the usual players that we see all year.sennafan24 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 09, 2020 5:31 pmI actually think Viz has a point.The Thorn wrote: ↑Fri Oct 09, 2020 5:28 pm Even if the standard is usually not that good, the variety and the different countries aspect makes it enjoyable for me. Even if a game is shite, it doesn't drag on for long because of the short format. A pairs tournament would be nice I guess but I don't think it should replace the WC. For most international players, this is their only chance of making their mark aside the Worlds, and in some cases the World Series.
They should have teams representing Asia, North America, etc. That would help trim the fat a bit.
Ahhhh, the IFM argument.The Thorn wrote: ↑Fri Oct 09, 2020 5:33 pmBut trimming the fat is exactly what removes the actual point of the event here. It would turn out to be the usual PDC tournament with the usual players that we see all year.sennafan24 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 09, 2020 5:31 pmI actually think Viz has a point.The Thorn wrote: ↑Fri Oct 09, 2020 5:28 pm Even if the standard is usually not that good, the variety and the different countries aspect makes it enjoyable for me. Even if a game is shite, it doesn't drag on for long because of the short format. A pairs tournament would be nice I guess but I don't think it should replace the WC. For most international players, this is their only chance of making their mark aside the Worlds, and in some cases the World Series.
They should have teams representing Asia, North America, etc. That would help trim the fat a bit.
2-player teams, yes. But neither Scotland nor Wales have sufficient stuff to warrant a 4-player team of their own, unless you want Thornton or Bates/Kenny to play.sennafan24 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 09, 2020 5:18 pmWhy combine Scotland and Wales when they both have decent teams?
Combining into larger teams seems good enough though.The Thorn wrote: ↑Fri Oct 09, 2020 5:31 pm Having 4 player teams just means the big nations, especially England are going to have a huge advantage. Every country can find 1 or 2 half decent players, but 4, not a chance. Even an irrelevant darts nation has a chance if they have a Paul Lim or a De Sousa. That adds to the unpredictability and the variety of the current event.
Ahhh, I glossed over the part where you mentioned 4-player teams.vizIIsto wrote: ↑Fri Oct 09, 2020 5:52 pm2-player teams, yes. But neither Scotland nor Wales have sufficient stuff to warrant a 4-player team of their own, unless you want Thornton or Bates/Kenny to play.sennafan24 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 09, 2020 5:18 pmWhy combine Scotland and Wales when they both have decent teams?
Not a bad idea in theory but completely takes away the point of the event imo. I wouldn't mind if this tournament existed alongside the World Cup but I certainly wouldn't replace the WC with it.vizIIsto wrote: ↑Fri Oct 09, 2020 5:56 pmCombining into larger teams seems good enough though.The Thorn wrote: ↑Fri Oct 09, 2020 5:31 pm Having 4 player teams just means the big nations, especially England are going to have a huge advantage. Every country can find 1 or 2 half decent players, but 4, not a chance. Even an irrelevant darts nation has a chance if they have a Paul Lim or a De Sousa. That adds to the unpredictability and the variety of the current event.
An Asia team would have Asada, Lim, Leung, Ilagan, or a few other names.
A Rest of Europe team would have Van den Bergh, Ratajski, Suljovic, de Sousa, and I'm voiding names like Razma, Labanauskas, Reyes, Larsson.
Netherlands or Scotland+Wales would have a hard fight against that Rest of Europe team.
So do you also think that people who say that The Masters or the Champions League should be removed entirely are wrong on their part?The Thorn wrote: ↑Fri Oct 09, 2020 6:42 pmNot a bad idea in theory but completely takes away the point of the event imo. I wouldn't mind if this tournament existed alongside the World Cup but I certainly wouldn't replace the WC with it.vizIIsto wrote: ↑Fri Oct 09, 2020 5:56 pmCombining into larger teams seems good enough though.The Thorn wrote: ↑Fri Oct 09, 2020 5:31 pm Having 4 player teams just means the big nations, especially England are going to have a huge advantage. Every country can find 1 or 2 half decent players, but 4, not a chance. Even an irrelevant darts nation has a chance if they have a Paul Lim or a De Sousa. That adds to the unpredictability and the variety of the current event.
An Asia team would have Asada, Lim, Leung, Ilagan, or a few other names.
A Rest of Europe team would have Van den Bergh, Ratajski, Suljovic, de Sousa, and I'm voiding names like Razma, Labanauskas, Reyes, Larsson.
Netherlands or Scotland+Wales would have a hard fight against that Rest of Europe team.
Like it or not, the World Cup is strategically important, just like the World Series are. You can criticise them all you like but they are here to stay because the PDC have their own reasons. I don't give a crap about the World Series personally, but just because I don't enjoy it, I don't throw ideas around to reform it, or to even better, scrap it. People who say the latter are pretty short-sighted.
Yes, I do. Champions League is also strategically important with the BBC contract. Though it certainly has its faults, the production in particular was pretty bad last year. As for the Masters, it potentially could do with an overhaul, I don't think it really offers anything that another PDC tournament doesn't. However, neither of them should be removed. You can choose not to watch them.vizIIsto wrote: ↑Fri Oct 09, 2020 6:50 pmSo do you also think that people who say that The Masters or the Champions League should be removed entirely are wrong on their part?The Thorn wrote: ↑Fri Oct 09, 2020 6:42 pmNot a bad idea in theory but completely takes away the point of the event imo. I wouldn't mind if this tournament existed alongside the World Cup but I certainly wouldn't replace the WC with it.vizIIsto wrote: ↑Fri Oct 09, 2020 5:56 pmCombining into larger teams seems good enough though.The Thorn wrote: ↑Fri Oct 09, 2020 5:31 pm Having 4 player teams just means the big nations, especially England are going to have a huge advantage. Every country can find 1 or 2 half decent players, but 4, not a chance. Even an irrelevant darts nation has a chance if they have a Paul Lim or a De Sousa. That adds to the unpredictability and the variety of the current event.
An Asia team would have Asada, Lim, Leung, Ilagan, or a few other names.
A Rest of Europe team would have Van den Bergh, Ratajski, Suljovic, de Sousa, and I'm voiding names like Razma, Labanauskas, Reyes, Larsson.
Netherlands or Scotland+Wales would have a hard fight against that Rest of Europe team.
Like it or not, the World Cup is strategically important, just like the World Series are. You can criticise them all you like but they are here to stay because the PDC have their own reasons. I don't give a crap about the World Series personally, but just because I don't enjoy it, I don't throw ideas around to reform it, or to even better, scrap it. People who say the latter are pretty short-sighted.
I think that the masters and CL are different, the masters is a bit of a damp squib being the first event after the worlds, and it being unranked.vizIIsto wrote: ↑Fri Oct 09, 2020 6:50 pmSo do you also think that people who say that The Masters or the Champions League should be removed entirely are wrong on their part?The Thorn wrote: ↑Fri Oct 09, 2020 6:42 pmNot a bad idea in theory but completely takes away the point of the event imo. I wouldn't mind if this tournament existed alongside the World Cup but I certainly wouldn't replace the WC with it.vizIIsto wrote: ↑Fri Oct 09, 2020 5:56 pmCombining into larger teams seems good enough though.The Thorn wrote: ↑Fri Oct 09, 2020 5:31 pm Having 4 player teams just means the big nations, especially England are going to have a huge advantage. Every country can find 1 or 2 half decent players, but 4, not a chance. Even an irrelevant darts nation has a chance if they have a Paul Lim or a De Sousa. That adds to the unpredictability and the variety of the current event.
An Asia team would have Asada, Lim, Leung, Ilagan, or a few other names.
A Rest of Europe team would have Van den Bergh, Ratajski, Suljovic, de Sousa, and I'm voiding names like Razma, Labanauskas, Reyes, Larsson.
Netherlands or Scotland+Wales would have a hard fight against that Rest of Europe team.
Like it or not, the World Cup is strategically important, just like the World Series are. You can criticise them all you like but they are here to stay because the PDC have their own reasons. I don't give a crap about the World Series personally, but just because I don't enjoy it, I don't throw ideas around to reform it, or to even better, scrap it. People who say the latter are pretty short-sighted.
Of course forgot himtungsten tossers wrote: ↑Fri Oct 09, 2020 6:50 pmaspinal would be in there.. shame that he didn't do better this week as he could of overtaken Cross