Page 3 of 3
Re: What job will Ted Hankey do when he finishes his sentence?
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 7:02 pm
by PT13
HalloweenJack wrote: ↑Fri Sep 08, 2023 5:04 pm
Ted’s 2000 world title had arguably a stronger field than the PDC equivalent. Back then he was a legitimate top 3 player in the world.
Better strength in depth in the field at that point, yes. But better than Taylor, Priestley, Manley, Harrington, Burgess, Warriner, Smiffy and a slow rising Part at the top?
Re: What job will Ted Hankey do when he finishes his sentence?
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 7:45 pm
by Cooking with Sandra
For sure.
Re: What job will Ted Hankey do when he finishes his sentence?
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 10:13 pm
by HalloweenJack
PT13 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 7:02 pm
HalloweenJack wrote: ↑Fri Sep 08, 2023 5:04 pm
Ted’s 2000 world title had arguably a stronger field than the PDC equivalent. Back then he was a legitimate top 3 player in the world.
Better strength in depth in the field at that point, yes. But better than Taylor, Priestley, Manley, Harrington, Burgess, Warriner, Smiffy and a slow rising Part at the top?
2000 was Hankey at his peak and it could be argued very strongly that he was better (at that time) than all the names you mention with the exception of Taylor.
Re: What job will Ted Hankey do when he finishes his sentence?
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 10:23 pm
by PT13
HalloweenJack wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 10:13 pm
PT13 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 7:02 pm
HalloweenJack wrote: ↑Fri Sep 08, 2023 5:04 pm
Ted’s 2000 world title had arguably a stronger field than the PDC equivalent. Back then he was a legitimate top 3 player in the world.
Better strength in depth in the field at that point, yes. But better than Taylor, Priestley, Manley, Harrington, Burgess, Warriner, Smiffy and a slow rising Part at the top?
2000 was Hankey at his peak and it could be argued very strongly that he was better (at that time) than all the names you mention with the exception of Taylor.
I doubt he was better than Priestley, Manley, Harrington or Burgess at that time. Admittedly, Hankey's win over Mason was very impressive.
Re: What job will Ted Hankey do when he finishes his sentence?
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 10:32 pm
by sennafan24
PT13 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 10:23 pm
HalloweenJack wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 10:13 pm
PT13 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 7:02 pm
HalloweenJack wrote: ↑Fri Sep 08, 2023 5:04 pm
Ted’s 2000 world title had arguably a stronger field than the PDC equivalent. Back then he was a legitimate top 3 player in the world.
Better strength in depth in the field at that point, yes. But better than Taylor, Priestley, Manley, Harrington, Burgess, Warriner, Smiffy and a slow rising Part at the top?
2000 was Hankey at his peak and it could be argued very strongly that he was better (at that time) than all the names you mention with the exception of Taylor.
I doubt he was better than Priestley, Manley, Harrington or Burgess at that time. Admittedly, Hankey's win over Mason was very impressive.
I actually think Priestley's win over Manley was just as, if not more, impressive than Hankey's win over Mason.
Re: What job will Ted Hankey do when he finishes his sentence?
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 10:36 pm
by sennafan24
PT13 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 7:02 pm
HalloweenJack wrote: ↑Fri Sep 08, 2023 5:04 pm
Ted’s 2000 world title had arguably a stronger field than the PDC equivalent. Back then he was a legitimate top 3 player in the world.
Better strength in depth in the field at that point, yes. But better than Taylor, Priestley, Manley, Harrington, Burgess, Warriner, Smiffy and a slow rising Part at the top?
BDO was probably at its strongest post-split between 2000 and 2004.
The PDC was becoming stronger during those years too though (Skol 6, etc)
Re: What job will Ted Hankey do when he finishes his sentence?
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 10:36 pm
by PT13
sennafan24 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 10:32 pm
PT13 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 10:23 pm
HalloweenJack wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 10:13 pm
PT13 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 7:02 pm
HalloweenJack wrote: ↑Fri Sep 08, 2023 5:04 pm
Ted’s 2000 world title had arguably a stronger field than the PDC equivalent. Back then he was a legitimate top 3 player in the world.
Better strength in depth in the field at that point, yes. But better than Taylor, Priestley, Manley, Harrington, Burgess, Warriner, Smiffy and a slow rising Part at the top?
2000 was Hankey at his peak and it could be argued very strongly that he was better (at that time) than all the names you mention with the exception of Taylor.
I doubt he was better than Priestley, Manley, Harrington or Burgess at that time. Admittedly, Hankey's win over Mason was very impressive.
I actually think Priestley's win over Manley was just as, if not more, impressive than Hankey's win over Mason.
Absolutely.