Wayne Mardle vs Kirk Shepherd revisited.

[sennafan24]

Mardle admits to playing mind-games before the game, choosing the wrong tactics by slowing down his game in set 2, and generally taking Shepherd too lightly.

What a div.

[Ross, Bob]

+1

[Randall]

Senna contributes something to the forum
For once
The vile cunt

[Randall]

Imagine an alternative universe where mardle beat shepherd and went on to be world champion

[sennafan24]

Imagine an alternative universe where mardle beat shepherd and went on to be world champion

Mardle had a winning record against Part as well.

Not saying he would have definitely beaten Part had he beaten Shepherd, but he certainly had the game to.

[thegentle]

Imagine an alternative universe where mardle beat shepherd and went on to be world champion

Utterly convinced Part would have won that final tbf, the difference between a big game player, and one who could only up it occasionally. The difference between great and not so great as Snackpot might say...

[Randall]

Imagine an alternative universe where mardle beat shepherd and went on to be world champion

Mardle had a winning record against Part as well.

Not saying he would have definitely beaten Part had he beaten Shepherd, but he certainly had the game to.

imagine the cunt sat there with 2008 world champion under him
vile

[sennafan24]

Imagine an alternative universe where mardle beat shepherd and went on to be world champion

Mardle had a winning record against Part as well.

Not saying he would have definitely beaten Part had he beaten Shepherd, but he certainly had the game to.

imagine the cunt sat there with 2008 world champion under him
vile

"Premier League Participant"

[Jimmi]

I think Mardle would have won it.
He showed some good bottle against Taylor.
Even if Taylor was nowhere near his best.

Part also wasn't great in the final but HAD Mardle not been a tit against Shepherd, I reckon he'd have won.

[Randall]

I think Mardle would have won it.
He showed some good bottle against Taylor.
Even if Taylor was nowhere near his best.

Part also wasn't great in the final but HAD Mardle not been a tit against Shepherd, I reckon he'd have won.

shudder

[sennafan24]

I think Mardle would have won it.
He showed some good bottle against Taylor.
Even if Taylor was nowhere near his best.

Part also wasn't great in the final but HAD Mardle not been a tit against Shepherd, I reckon he'd have won.

It could have gone either way really.

Despite what I typed above about Mardle's H2H record against Part, I would still lean towards Part winning. I think Mardle would have found a way to lose.

[Jimmi]

I think Mardle would have won it.
He showed some good bottle against Taylor.
Even if Taylor was nowhere near his best.

Part also wasn't great in the final but HAD Mardle not been a tit against Shepherd, I reckon he'd have won.

It could have gone either way really.

Despite what I typed above about Mardle's H2H record against Part, I would still lean towards Part winning. I think Mardle would have found a way to lose.

If Mardle stumbled over the line, I'm sure he'd have taken it as serious as he did against Taylor and a found a way of digging in and pipping Part to the post.

Part's average in the final and Mardle's against Taylor were very similar. So it definitely would have been close.

[Randall]

i dont think i even bothered watching the 08 final

[Jimmi]

i dont think i even bothered watching the 08 final

One of my fondest memories of darts is of Mardle beating Taylor and Mardle fucking it up.

[thegentle]

I think Mardle would have won it.
He showed some good bottle against Taylor.
Even if Taylor was nowhere near his best.

Part also wasn't great in the final but HAD Mardle not been a tit against Shepherd, I reckon he'd have won.

It could have gone either way really.

Despite what I typed above about Mardle's H2H record against Part, I would still lean towards Part winning. I think Mardle would have found a way to lose.

If Mardle stumbled over the line, I'm sure he'd have taken it as serious as he did against Taylor and a found a way of digging in and pipping Part to the post.

Part's average in the final and Mardle's against Taylor were very similar. So it definitely would have been close.

Every chance Part would have upped it too against Mardle tbf

[Jimmi]

I think Mardle would have won it.
He showed some good bottle against Taylor.
Even if Taylor was nowhere near his best.

Part also wasn't great in the final but HAD Mardle not been a tit against Shepherd, I reckon he'd have won.

It could have gone either way really.

Despite what I typed above about Mardle's H2H record against Part, I would still lean towards Part winning. I think Mardle would have found a way to lose.

If Mardle stumbled over the line, I'm sure he'd have taken it as serious as he did against Taylor and a found a way of digging in and pipping Part to the post.

Part's average in the final and Mardle's against Taylor were very similar. So it definitely would have been close.

Every chance Part would have upped it too against Mardle tbf

True.
I wonder what the crowd would have been like?
50/50 split?

[Randall]

I think Mardle would have won it.
He showed some good bottle against Taylor.
Even if Taylor was nowhere near his best.

Part also wasn't great in the final but HAD Mardle not been a tit against Shepherd, I reckon he'd have won.

It could have gone either way really.

Despite what I typed above about Mardle's H2H record against Part, I would still lean towards Part winning. I think Mardle would have found a way to lose.

If Mardle stumbled over the line, I'm sure he'd have taken it as serious as he did against Taylor and a found a way of digging in and pipping Part to the post.

Part's average in the final and Mardle's against Taylor were very similar. So it definitely would have been close.

Every chance Part would have upped it too against Mardle tbf

True.
I wonder what the crowd would have been like?
50/50 split?

Would have been pro mardle I'm sure

[Randall]

The vile cunts

[Jimmi]

It could have gone either way really.

Despite what I typed above about Mardle's H2H record against Part, I would still lean towards Part winning. I think Mardle would have found a way to lose.

If Mardle stumbled over the line, I'm sure he'd have taken it as serious as he did against Taylor and a found a way of digging in and pipping Part to the post.

Part's average in the final and Mardle's against Taylor were very similar. So it definitely would have been close.

Every chance Part would have upped it too against Mardle tbf

True.
I wonder what the crowd would have been like?
50/50 split?

Would have been pro mardle I'm sure

Part the "dirty foreigner".

[Randall]

If Mardle stumbled over the line, I'm sure he'd have taken it as serious as he did against Taylor and a found a way of digging in and pipping Part to the post.

Part's average in the final and Mardle's against Taylor were very similar. So it definitely would have been close.

Every chance Part would have upped it too against Mardle tbf

True.
I wonder what the crowd would have been like?
50/50 split?

Would have been pro mardle I'm sure

Part the "dirty foreigner".

My memory is appalling but I assume the tavern crowd in 06 for his semi against Taylor must have been a bit lively