Page 4 of 7

Re: Site Censorship

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 11:55 am
by Dicie
Darth Randall wrote:
in the gravy wrote:Without Gaz this place suffers. My two cents.
nobody here wants gaz not posting, just moderating the tone of his more extreme opinions.

several people i would rather see leave than gaz, not least of which because i need another book cover designing :mrgreen:

Maybe try growing a pair and naming them. Usually works.

All the arse kissing of Gaz is laughable. Specially considering Randall you were one of the ones back stage to say he should be got rid of.

Re: Site Censorship

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 11:57 am
by Randall
Dicie wrote:
Darth Randall wrote:
in the gravy wrote:Without Gaz this place suffers. My two cents.
nobody here wants gaz not posting, just moderating the tone of his more extreme opinions.

several people i would rather see leave than gaz, not least of which because i need another book cover designing :mrgreen:

Maybe try growing a pair and naming them. Usually works.

All the arse kissing of Gaz is laughable. Specially considering Randall you were one of the ones back stage to say he should be got rid of.
that is a lie and well you know it.

Re: Site Censorship

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 11:59 am
by Dicie
Darth Randall wrote:
Dicie wrote:
Darth Randall wrote:
in the gravy wrote:Without Gaz this place suffers. My two cents.
nobody here wants gaz not posting, just moderating the tone of his more extreme opinions.

several people i would rather see leave than gaz, not least of which because i need another book cover designing :mrgreen:

Maybe try growing a pair and naming them. Usually works.

All the arse kissing of Gaz is laughable. Specially considering Randall you were one of the ones back stage to say he should be got rid of.
that is a lie and well you know it.

Oh you know its the truth Randy. Care for me to quote what was said when i said oche should be got rid of for his no productive posting?

"Well if that is the case Gaz has to go aswell"

Kinda of dampened things when i agreed.

Re: Site Censorship

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 11:59 am
by M H
Gotta say I don't recall Randall wanting to bin Gaz Dicie.

Re: Site Censorship

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 12:02 pm
by Randall
i called for nobody to be banned. i defended everyone as you well know.

you can take things from a conversation out of context if you wish it doesnt make what you say true.

Re: Site Censorship

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 12:04 pm
by Dicie
Darth Randall wrote:i called for nobody to be banned. i defended everyone as you well know.

you can take things from a conversation out of context if you wish it doesnt make what you say true.
You defend everyone, but state there are a few here you would rather see leave than Gaz, but havent got the bollox to name them. Not a shock their is it.

Gaz is gone. Forum has a chance to grow now.

Re: Site Censorship

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 12:06 pm
by Randall
im not interested in arguing with you. got better things to do.

anyione who has read the back knows i have never and do not want gaz binned.

Re: Site Censorship

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 12:08 pm
by Dicie
Darth Randall wrote:im not interested in arguing with you. got better things to do.

anyione who has read the back knows i have never and do not want gaz binned.

Funny that, i was 1 of them that read it that you did.

Re: Site Censorship

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 1:16 pm
by micko
Darth Randall wrote:several people i would rather see leave than gaz,
:shock: :o :oops:

Bollox!

Re: Site Censorship

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 1:19 pm
by micko
Dicie wrote:
Darth Randall wrote:
in the gravy wrote:Without Gaz this place suffers. My two cents.
nobody here wants gaz not posting, just moderating the tone of his more extreme opinions.

several people i would rather see leave than gaz, not least of which because i need another book cover designing :mrgreen:

Maybe try growing a pair and naming them. Usually works.
Why do people think you need to grow a pair to post on a forum, surely it's the easiest things in the world to do. There's little slips of girls calling each other names on facebook everyday.

Re: Site Censorship

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 2:11 pm
by welsh
Dicie wrote:
Darth Randall wrote:
Dicie wrote:
Darth Randall wrote:
in the gravy wrote:Without Gaz this place suffers. My two cents.
nobody here wants gaz not posting, just moderating the tone of his more extreme opinions.

several people i would rather see leave than gaz, not least of which because i need another book cover designing :mrgreen:

Maybe try growing a pair and naming them. Usually works.

All the arse kissing of Gaz is laughable. Specially considering Randall you were one of the ones back stage to say he should be got rid of.
that is a lie and well you know it.

Oh you know its the truth Randy. Care for me to quote what was said when i said oche should be got rid of for his no productive posting?

"Well if that is the case Gaz has to go aswell"

Kinda of dampened things when i agreed.
That could easily be taken out of context so it doesn't prove jack shit unless you can remember the actual question to why randall gave that reply..

Re: Site Censorship

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 2:41 pm
by Dicie
That could easily be taken out of context so it doesn't prove jack shit unless you can remember the actual question to why randall gave that reply..

I can remember it perfectly well, considering i was the one suggesting that oche be got rid of.

Re: Site Censorship

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 3:34 pm
by fandarts
gaz is a complex character, he is/was great for this forum on one hand but on the other the old football cliche springs to mind"no 1 player is bigger than a club"

the thing is gaz has been culled on every forum i have encountered him, (well self exclusion here) tsod df, and a irish based forum i was reading last year and low and behold gaz popped up with his "views" and was banned :) everyone is entitled to their views but at some level you must have the cop on to reign it in a bit, we have all acted the maggot , myself included at times but as joey once said on friends" your so past the line, you cant see the line, the line is a dot to you"

Re: Site Censorship

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 3:50 pm
by Randall
welsh wrote:
Dicie wrote:[quote="Darth Randall"

"Well if that is the case Gaz has to go aswell"

Kinda of dampened things when i agreed.
That could easily be taken out of context so it doesn't prove jack shit unless you can remember the actual question to why randall gave that reply..
mate, simply put dicie wanted to ban people who weren't posting productively, in this case i think it was oche, i was making the point that you could level that against anyone, maybe i used gaz as an example, i don't care enough to look to be honest.

i have not called for anybody to be banned, if members don't want to take my word for that and believe dicie that is fine.

Re: Site Censorship

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 6:05 pm
by Snakehipsx2
Well this has been a thoroughly amusing read.

Re: Site Censorship

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 6:09 pm
by D & B
Snakehipsx2 wrote:Well this has been a thoroughly amusing read.
If you ask Oche nicely he'll start an appreciation group for you.

Re: Site Censorship

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 6:19 pm
by Snakehipsx2
D & B wrote:
Snakehipsx2 wrote:Well this has been a thoroughly amusing read.
If you ask Oche nicely he'll start an appreciation group for you.
The boy is a phenomenon.

Re: Site Censorship

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 6:20 pm
by D & B
Snakehipsx2 wrote:
D & B wrote:
Snakehipsx2 wrote:Well this has been a thoroughly amusing read.
If you ask Oche nicely he'll start an appreciation group for you.
The boy is a phenomenon.
Aye, certainly is special.

Re: Site Censorship

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 6:21 pm
by Darty
Ohh Snakehips is here

Re: Site Censorship

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 6:28 pm
by Snakehipsx2
Pool comp on over the way later D&B if you fancy it.

Behave Snakey, MH