Page 27 of 29
Re: The Saville Enquiry
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2015 11:30 pm
by Randall
Absolutely everyone who has come forward about Saville having said nothing for 30 odd years couldn't possibly just be after money surely
Re: The Saville Enquiry
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2015 11:36 pm
by Justin Credible
Darth Randall wrote:Absolutely everyone who has come forward about Saville having said nothing for 30 odd years couldn't possibly just be after money surely
of course they are.
I am not buying this shit that people were scared of an old crippled man and he had to die leaving a fortune before "victims " came forward.
Ken Barlow and Kevin Webster from coronation street 2 examples of people just being rounded up on hearsay, not one fact that would get a conviction.
I am all for convicting those that might be guilty but most of these cases had no business ever being near a court house, the police should be ashamed of themselves and investigated, and any cunt lying to get a conviction should feel the full force of the law
Re: The Saville Enquiry
Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2015 9:57 am
by Sheep Shagger
Justin Credible wrote:Darth Randall wrote:Absolutely everyone who has come forward about Saville having said nothing for 30 odd years couldn't possibly just be after money surely
of course they are.
I am not buying this shit that people were scared of an old crippled man and he had to die leaving a fortune before "victims " came forward.
Ken Barlow and Kevin Webster from coronation street 2 examples of people just being rounded up on hearsay, not one fact that would get a conviction.
I am all for convicting those that might be guilty but most of these cases had no business ever being near a court house, the police should be ashamed of themselves and investigated, and any cunt lying to get a conviction should feel the full force of the law
The perfect example is Dave Lee travis, after umpteen allegations and court cases they found him guilty of touching a woman's bottom - we can sleep safely tonight! Surely by definition if bill roach or levelle are found to be innocent then the person making the allegations is found to be a liar?
Re: The Saville Enquiry
Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2015 10:47 am
by Justin Credible
if a woman accuses a man of rape and is found to have lied that cunt should face the same sentence as the man.
She should serve the same length od sentence, and hope all those type of women eventually get raped themselves to teach them karma
Re: The Saville Enquiry
Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2015 12:48 pm
by Sheep Shagger
Lovely
Re: The Saville Enquiry
Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2015 1:14 pm
by Justin Credible
it is.
A woman who lies and destroys an innocent mans life deserves everything she gets
Re: The Saville Enquiry
Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2015 3:13 pm
by Randall
nikkiboy wrote:Justin Credible wrote:Darth Randall wrote:Absolutely everyone who has come forward about Saville having said nothing for 30 odd years couldn't possibly just be after money surely
of course they are.
I am not buying this shit that people were scared of an old crippled man and he had to die leaving a fortune before "victims " came forward.
Ken Barlow and Kevin Webster from coronation street 2 examples of people just being rounded up on hearsay, not one fact that would get a conviction.
I am all for convicting those that might be guilty but most of these cases had no business ever being near a court house, the police should be ashamed of themselves and investigated, and any cunt lying to get a conviction should feel the full force of the law
The perfect example is Dave Lee travis, after umpteen allegations and court cases they found him guilty of touching a woman's bottom - we can sleep safely tonight! Surely by definition if bill roach or levelle are found to be innocent then the person making the allegations is found to be a liar?
It means there wasn't enough evidence to prove guilt, doesn’t mean you didn't do it or the complainant was lying.
The dlt case was utter pig swill.
Re: The Saville Enquiry
Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2015 3:16 pm
by Justin Credible
dont matter if he did it in your opinion,
The law states innocent til proven guilty, if they cannot prove it then he should be free.
You cannot bend the rules to sway public opinion or public hype and media frenzy bullshit.
Its bad enough yer police force is one of the most corrupt in the world without compounding it.
Re: The Saville Enquiry
Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2015 3:19 pm
by Randall
Justin Credible wrote:dont matter if he did it in your opinion,
The law states innocent til proven guilty, if they cannot prove it then he should be free.
You cannot bend the rules to sway public opinion or public hype and media frenzy bullshit.
Just regarding nick's point that a bot guilty means the women lied, doesn't mean that, though of course they might have
Its bad enough yer police force is one of the most corrupt in the world without compounding it.
Re: The Saville Enquiry
Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2015 10:49 pm
by martin71109
Anybody watched the program on channel 5 tonight.
Shocking.
Re: The Saville Enquiry
Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2015 11:01 pm
by Randall
Is channel 5 still going?
Re: The Saville Enquiry
Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2015 2:16 pm
by The Ginge Reaper
Re: The Saville Enquiry
Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2015 2:19 pm
by Noisycrowds
martin71109 wrote:Anybody watched the program on chanel no 5 tonight.
Shocking.
stinks mate
Re: The Saville Enquiry
Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2015 4:06 pm
by M H
Bet he never forecast that
Re: The Saville Enquiry
Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2015 5:39 pm
by The Ginge Reaper
Re: The Saville Enquiry
Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2015 6:15 pm
by M H
Giving too intimate examinations?
Re: The Saville Enquiry
Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2015 11:14 am
by Surreys finest
Justin Credible wrote:it is.
A woman who lies and destroys an innocent mans life deserves everything she gets
The thing is that very few rape cases are clear cut. It is usually one persons word against anothers. You can't say that just because a man is cleared by a jury that the woman is automatically a liar. The trouble with punishing a woman severely for lying about rape is that it will scare genuine cases from coming forward.
I despise rape and rapists, I hate blokes that won't take no for an answer and just force the issue by getting the woman more and more drunk and then taking them home. They tend to get overlooked in the grand scheme of cuntiness.
Obviously , fake allegations are utterly vile and deserve punishement but its a tricky balancing act
Re: The Saville Enquiry
Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2015 11:22 am
by Randall
Not guilty and innocent are two totally different things.
Oj Simpson for example
Re: The Saville Enquiry
Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2015 11:47 am
by Surreys finest
Darth Randall wrote:Not guilty and innocent are two totally different things.
Oj Simpson for example
Precisely. I do agree with some of the police hate though. They are the masters of looking after their own. The amount of people who die in police cells with no repurcussions for any member of the force is astounding
Re: The Saville Enquiry
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2015 4:01 pm
by The Ginge Reaper
"Doctor, Doctor, give me the news
I've got a bad case of touching youths"
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-32022625