That sounds about average for the quarters, right? All four winners at or around the 100 mark and only one of the losers standing out as well below par
2019 Worlds - Averages
- thegentle
- Posts: 15072
- Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2017 8:52 am
- Location: Watford
- Contact:
Re: 2019 Worlds - Averages

- Rogg
- Posts: 87457
- Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2015 11:33 pm
- Contact:
Re: 2019 Worlds - Averages
That description is a very good summary of last year's quarters too, as it goes (below). Cannibal posted stats for previous years up thread.
2018 QF
(102.91) Michael van Gerwen 5-4 Raymond van Barneveld (98.76)
(102.02) Phil Taylor 5-3 Gary Anderson (98.68)
(101.26) Jamie Lewis 5-0 Darren Webster (91.85)
(97.13) Rob Cross 5-4 Dimitri Van den Bergh (98.60)
not a girl
- cannibal
- Posts: 7159
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 12:41 am
- Location: Tipping cows in fields Elysian
- Contact:
Re: 2019 Worlds - Averages
Would say the 2018 had the better standard avg wise as it looks like more legs played with a better standard. Would have to do the calculation to be sure but I would bet my left nut on it. Better viewing by far as those matches also included the names, played it close at a good standard. Add in a few new names that throw at a good pace and the whole cross affair. Way better than this year I think. With one exception, Lil' Webster the one that fucked it all up but thankfully he went down in straight sets (And he thought he should be in the PL, little twat should fuck off to soft tip).
We Do Not Desire Tributes.
We Desire Information.
We Seek The Worm Drink Who Has Lately Betrayed His Nation
We Desire Information.
We Seek The Worm Drink Who Has Lately Betrayed His Nation
- tungsten tossers
- Posts: 174049
- Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2018 3:09 pm
- Location: Surrey
- Contact:
Re: 2019 Worlds - Averages
It's a shame that none of the quarters were closer games, not one game reaching eight sets.cannibal wrote: ↑Sun Dec 30, 2018 4:01 pm Would say the 2018 had the better standard avg wise as it looks like more legs played with a better standard. Would have to do the calculation to be sure but I would bet my left nut on it. Better viewing by far as those matches also included the names, played it close at a good standard. Add in a few new names that throw at a good pace and the whole cross affair. Way better than this year I think. With one exception, Lil' Webster the one that fucked it all up but thankfully he went down in straight sets (And he thought he should be in the PL, little twat should fuck off to soft tip).
The seeds crashing out so early didn't help as you would have expected the likes of crusty, gurney, price and wade to put up a better fight in the QF than the likes of Joyce and Luke.
I suppose last year we had the cross v smith cross v dimitri and the epic v MvG to enjoy, whereas this year those types of games are sadly lacking.
We have three enjoyable to watch players still in the tournament, so I hope that the semi's tonight are quality games.
For a new format, the tournament hasn't been too bad, just a bit of a shame that so many seeds went so early,
I haven't seen the total 180 stats that sky normally put on the screen this year but with the expansion, I would think that it would be higher than last year. It will be interesting to see the total legs played v last year
- Rogg
- Posts: 87457
- Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2015 11:33 pm
- Contact:
Re: 2019 Worlds - Averages
Semis.
(105.22) Michael Smith 6-3 Nathan Aspinall (100.53)
(104.76) Michael van Gerwen 6-1 Gary Anderson (97.98)
Average of the averages: 102.12
Not bad. Looking at the MVG-v-RVB high lunacy on 2017 semi-final night. 114 v 109, good god. Immortality.
(105.22) Michael Smith 6-3 Nathan Aspinall (100.53)
(104.76) Michael van Gerwen 6-1 Gary Anderson (97.98)
Average of the averages: 102.12
Not bad. Looking at the MVG-v-RVB high lunacy on 2017 semi-final night. 114 v 109, good god. Immortality.
not a girl
- Rogg
- Posts: 87457
- Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2015 11:33 pm
- Contact:
- Rogg
- Posts: 87457
- Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2015 11:33 pm
- Contact:
Re: 2019 Worlds - Averages
According to oche, who rarely gives the source. Maybe it's him.
The 2019 tournament average - including the new Round of 96 - slots in between 2013 and 2014, possibly surprisingly.
Tournament Average: 92.05
2018: 94.50
2017: 94.46
2016: 93.39
2015: 93.47
2014: 92.53
2013: 91.95
2012: 91.62
2011: 91.40
The 2019 tournament average - including the new Round of 96 - slots in between 2013 and 2014, possibly surprisingly.
Tournament Average: 92.05
2018: 94.50
2017: 94.46
2016: 93.39
2015: 93.47
2014: 92.53
2013: 91.95
2012: 91.62
2011: 91.40
not a girl
- Rogg
- Posts: 87457
- Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2015 11:33 pm
- Contact:
Re: 2019 Worlds - Averages
and the piss palace stats if anyone's interested, thanks again to TheRedBit180:

not a girl
- Randall
- Site Admin
- Posts: 209559
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2011 2:59 pm
- Location: On a hill surrounded by Indians (Leicester)
- Contact:
Re: 2019 Worlds - Averages
The pdc 1st round average was virtually the same as the overall piss palace average?

- Fiss Plaps
- Posts: 8746
- Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2018 5:07 pm
- Location: Quadruple 20
- Contact:
Re: 2019 Worlds - Averages
Another damning indictment on the "World Pro".
2020 World Grand Prix Lucky Dip winner!
2x 2019 Q-School Lucky Dip winner!
Both as valuable as the Lakeside piss pot!
2x 2019 Q-School Lucky Dip winner!
Both as valuable as the Lakeside piss pot!
- Randall
- Site Admin
- Posts: 209559
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2011 2:59 pm
- Location: On a hill surrounded by Indians (Leicester)
- Contact:
Re: 2019 Worlds - Averages
Speaks volumes

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], dting05, Google [Bot], IndyCarDavid, Semrush [Bot], tungsten tossers and 26 guests