The Saville Enquiry

[Justin Credible]

its all it ever was about, hungry money chasing cunts

[Randall]

oh what a surprise.

without ever being convicted of anything you wonder why the estate can be forced to pay up.

[M H]

oh what a surprise.

without ever being convicted of anything you wonder why the estate can be forced to pay up.

No doubt he was the ultimate pervert but without a conviction it goes against all legal conventions that I know

[Randall]

oh what a surprise.

without ever being convicted of anything you wonder why the estate can be forced to pay up.

No doubt he was the ultimate pervert but without a conviction it goes against all legal conventions that I know

if the estate said on what grounds are these being settled they'd be fucked.

all very confusing.

[M H]

He's learning, just a bit too late

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-26383811

[Randall]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-26787306

ffs

how much more money do they want to fuck away.

[Justin Credible]

they wont rest til they exhausted a fortune trying to convict him

[M H]

About time someone spoke out about this mess

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-26974585

[Randall]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-27041407

oh just fuck off.

[Justin Credible]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-27041407

oh just fuck off.

probably his hand rubbed of a girls ass twenty years ago

this needs to be prosecuted to the full with no expense of the tax payers money

[M H]

I agree with the criticism mate and it's not before time.

DLT was charged with another offence going back to the 90's earlier which will no doubt be found not guilty

[Randall]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-27103873

like rats off a sinking ship they will come.

[Justin Credible]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-27103873

like rats off a sinking ship they will come.

This is so wrong on so many levels.

140 people now claiming to have been abused and not one came forward when he was alive....what a load of shit, a perv might cover up one or two even a half dozen if intelligent enough, but 140....has to be bullshit

[Randall]

looks like bullshit, smell like bullshit, chances are it is bullshit.

what burden of evidence do you need for your 60K?

[Justin Credible]

add in the fact the guy is now dead and cannot defend himself....very convenient

[M H]

How the fuck did they get a guilty?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-27192600

[Justin Credible]

How the fuck did they get a guilty?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-27192600

showing a pic of him with OJ is what the are reduced to , in order to sensationalize a story that looks likes the most flimsy proof.

Its beyond a joke, in fact this is quite serious that the prosecution and authorities are getting convictions on very little actual evidence and proof.

I am not saying he innocent completely but no dna, no concrete evidence but a he said she said type of accusation getting people convicted is a worrying thing for the so called justice system.

But why would I be surprised, after all british so called justice has always been corrupt, ask the thousands of Irishmen treated like shit over the decades, my own fathers friend died in a british police cell after being arrested when leaving a bar, a bar where he was the drummer in a band playing in that pub, and then died in an accidental death, dont get me started on the birmingham six, guildford 4 and countless other related incidents.

[The Ginge Reaper]

How the fuck did they get a guilty?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-27192600

showing a pic of him with OJ is what the are reduced to , in order to sensationalize a story that looks likes the most flimsy proof.

Its beyond a joke, in fact this is quite serious that the prosecution and authorities are getting convictions on very little actual evidence and proof.

I am not saying he innocent completely but no dna, no concrete evidence but a he said she said type of accusation getting people convicted is a worrying thing for the so called justice system..

This is the first conviction under Yewtree and he was found guilty by 12 independent individuals. That will do for me.

[Justin Credible]

How the fuck did they get a guilty?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-27192600

showing a pic of him with OJ is what the are reduced to , in order to sensationalize a story that looks likes the most flimsy proof.

Its beyond a joke, in fact this is quite serious that the prosecution and authorities are getting convictions on very little actual evidence and proof.

I am not saying he innocent completely but no dna, no concrete evidence but a he said she said type of accusation getting people convicted is a worrying thing for the so called justice system..

This is the first conviction under Yewtree and he was found guilty by 12 independent individuals. That will do for me.

Thats what rhe general public said when innocent irish people were tortured beaten and locked up for years for something they never did.
Now the comparison is obviously different, but the conviction does seem based on very little evidence.

for the record I never liked Max clifford but that should not be a deciding factor when ones freedom and reputation is on the line for a sentence which appears to have been got on little actual evidence.

[The Ginge Reaper]

How the fuck did they get a guilty?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-27192600

showing a pic of him with OJ is what the are reduced to , in order to sensationalize a story that looks likes the most flimsy proof.

Its beyond a joke, in fact this is quite serious that the prosecution and authorities are getting convictions on very little actual evidence and proof.

I am not saying he innocent completely but no dna, no concrete evidence but a he said she said type of accusation getting people convicted is a worrying thing for the so called justice system..

This is the first conviction under Yewtree and he was found guilty by 12 independent individuals. That will do for me.

Thats what rhe general public said when innocent irish people were tortured beaten and locked up for years for something they never did.
Now the comparison is obviously different, but the conviction does seem based on very little evidence.

for the record I never liked Max clifford but that should not be a deciding factor when ones freedom and reputation is on the line for a sentence which appears to have been got on little actual evidence.

If there was so little evidence them surely the jury would have "voted" accordingly?