Page 903 of 1624

Re: Rogg's Twatter Watch

Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2020 7:14 pm
by Potter's Lake
The Grand Slam should be 8 men, 8 women, 8 non-white players, and 8 transsexuals. If nothing else it gives the RJR clan something to do.

Re: Rogg's Twatter Watch

Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2020 7:31 pm
by Safc
Potter's Lake wrote: Tue Jan 21, 2020 7:14 pm The Grand Slam should be 8 men, 8 women, 8 non-white players, and 8 transsexuals. If nothing else it gives the RJR clan something to do.
What about Aliens and Disabled people

Re: Rogg's Twatter Watch

Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2020 7:34 pm
by Mabbsy
Safc wrote: Tue Jan 21, 2020 7:31 pm
Potter's Lake wrote: Tue Jan 21, 2020 7:14 pm The Grand Slam should be 8 men, 8 women, 8 non-white players, and 8 transsexuals. If nothing else it gives the RJR clan something to do.
What about Aliens and Disabled people
Plenty of candidates posting on here I reckon

Re: Rogg's Twatter Watch

Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2020 7:43 pm
by mad jock
Potter's Lake wrote: Tue Jan 21, 2020 7:14 pm The Grand Slam should be 8 men, 8 women, 8 non-white players, and 8 transsexuals. If nothing else it gives the RJR clan something to do.

Trannies with nicho in commentary, even i might turn the volume on :lol:

Re: Rogg's Twatter Watch

Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2020 8:04 pm
by Emulsfier
If there isnt a man, woman, Peterson, transsexual and disabled person all commentating every match all at the same time ill be writing a letter to ofcom.

Re: Rogg's Twatter Watch

Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2020 8:13 pm
by Safc
Emulsfier wrote: Tue Jan 21, 2020 8:04 pm If there isnt a man, woman, Peterson, transsexual and disabled person all commentating every match all at the same time ill be writing a letter to ofcom.
Peterson :lol:

Re: Rogg's Twatter Watch

Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2020 11:11 pm
by whereisman
Safc wrote: Tue Jan 21, 2020 7:31 pm
Potter's Lake wrote: Tue Jan 21, 2020 7:14 pm The Grand Slam should be 8 men, 8 women, 8 non-white players, and 8 transsexuals. If nothing else it gives the RJR clan something to do.
What about Aliens and Disabled people
Plenty of mongos on tour as it is. Wouldn't need special dispensation for the disabled.

Re: Rogg's Twatter Watch

Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2020 3:36 am
by SuperSwede
Emulsfier wrote: Tue Jan 21, 2020 4:37 pm Phill Barrs seems a nice enough chap, but my god he is thick as anything.
He is really outdoing himself the last few days. One in each group ffs the women's game is only just establishing some form of credibility and he wants it flushed down the toilet before it can even gather some traction by putting Laura Turner or Casey Gallgher et al lose three games each without winning a leg between them to the likes of Murnan or Alcinas live on SKY so they can die a death on there and take the women's game with them.

Even Studd's suggestion of four women in the World's is a stretch for now.

Re: Rogg's Twatter Watch

Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2020 12:58 pm
by thegentle
SuperSwede wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2020 3:36 am
Emulsfier wrote: Tue Jan 21, 2020 4:37 pm Phill Barrs seems a nice enough chap, but my god he is thick as anything.
He is really outdoing himself the last few days. One in each group ffs the women's game is only just establishing some form of credibility and he wants it flushed down the toilet before it can even gather some traction by putting Laura Turner or Casey Gallgher et al lose three games each without winning a leg between them to the likes of Murnan or Alcinas live on SKY so they can die a death on there and take the women's game with them.

Even Studd's suggestion of four women in the World's is a stretch for now.
The breakdown of qualification places for the Worlds is ideal at the moment, even if you could guarantee that the four women would be Ashton, Sherrock, Suzuki and the next best ROTW player (Sato? Ana's a bit shit now unfortunately) and not some uber jobber, I don't see who should miss out. Unfortunately Barry might have got some ideas from the last few weeks

Re: Rogg's Twatter Watch

Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2020 4:19 am
by SuperSwede
thegentle wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2020 12:58 pm
SuperSwede wrote: Wed Jan 22, 2020 3:36 am
Emulsfier wrote: Tue Jan 21, 2020 4:37 pm Phill Barrs seems a nice enough chap, but my god he is thick as anything.
He is really outdoing himself the last few days. One in each group ffs the women's game is only just establishing some form of credibility and he wants it flushed down the toilet before it can even gather some traction by putting Laura Turner or Casey Gallgher et al lose three games each without winning a leg between them to the likes of Murnan or Alcinas live on SKY so they can die a death on there and take the women's game with them.

Even Studd's suggestion of four women in the World's is a stretch for now.
The breakdown of qualification places for the Worlds is ideal at the moment, even if you could guarantee that the four women would be Ashton, Sherrock, Suzuki and the next best ROTW player (Sato? Ana's a bit shit now unfortunately) and not some uber jobber, I don't see who should miss out. Unfortunately Barry might have got some ideas from the last few weeks
The only reliable four for a respectable standard are Ashton, Sherrock, Greaves and Suzuki. One qualifier from each the UK is almost never going to not be one of the first three so is fine. Can't be seen to overly manipulate qualifiers for the World's either with seedings (tough to do anyway with Ashton a card holder) so best to leave as it is and utilise events where they can handpick them like the Grand Slam where i'd expect all four to be.

Re: Rogg's Twatter Watch

Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2020 9:30 am
by Randall
If your going to rely on a 16 year old girl it's pretty obvious the womens game is in the gutter.

Re: Rogg's Twatter Watch

Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2020 11:44 am
by The Thorn
Better than Trina flying the flag though

Re: Rogg's Twatter Watch

Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2020 12:33 pm
by tungsten tossers
From Erik Middelkoop


Re: Rogg's Twatter Watch

Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2020 2:46 pm
by Rogg

Re: Rogg's Twatter Watch

Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2020 9:44 pm
by Potter's Lake
Mincer acknowledging his UK Open excursion, the bells are tolling.

Re: Rogg's Twatter Watch

Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2020 12:27 pm
by sennafan24
At least Mason has good taste in sportsmen.

(disclaimer: I know fuck all about football)


Re: Rogg's Twatter Watch

Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2020 1:21 pm
by oche balboa
sennafan24 wrote: Fri Jan 24, 2020 12:27 pm At least Mason has good taste in sportsmen.

(disclaimer: I know fuck all about football)

Blimey you don't like football....amazing

Re: Rogg's Twatter Watch

Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2020 1:28 pm
by Wolflanternbumbag
sennafan24 wrote: Fri Jan 24, 2020 12:27 pm At least Mason has good taste in sportsmen.

(disclaimer: I know fuck all about football)

Bandit?

Re: Rogg's Twatter Watch

Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2020 1:50 pm
by sennafan24
oche balboa wrote: Fri Jan 24, 2020 1:21 pm
sennafan24 wrote: Fri Jan 24, 2020 12:27 pm At least Mason has good taste in sportsmen.

(disclaimer: I know fuck all about football)

Blimey you don't like football....amazing
I don't mind it. Just not that interested in it.

Same as you with professional darts.

Re: Rogg's Twatter Watch

Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2020 2:28 pm
by ILAD
sennafan24 wrote: Fri Jan 24, 2020 1:50 pm
oche balboa wrote: Fri Jan 24, 2020 1:21 pm
sennafan24 wrote: Fri Jan 24, 2020 12:27 pm At least Mason has good taste in sportsmen.

(disclaimer: I know fuck all about football)

Blimey you don't like football....amazing
I don't mind it. Just not that interested in it.

Same as you with professional darts.
:D :D