Oche Balboa wrote:Haye was never a world class fighter, he got a bit lucky he was in a division which is the poorest its been for 30-40 years, The Klitschko brothers would not be in the greatest 25 heavyweights for me
At Cruiser of course he was....comfortably the best in the division...
As randalls already pointed out he's a tad small at heavy.....then again, it diddnt stop Tyson and Holyfield.
tyson and holyfield had the warrior instinct, never seen that in haye to be honest.
oche raises an interesting point re the russians though, would vitali not make the top 25 of all time?
Oche Balboa wrote:Haye was never a world class fighter, he got a bit lucky he was in a division which is the poorest its been for 30-40 years, The Klitschko brothers would not be in the greatest 25 heavyweights for me
At Cruiser of course he was....comfortably the best in the division...
As randalls already pointed out he's a tad small at heavy.....then again, it diddnt stop Tyson and Holyfield.
tyson and holyfield had the warrior instinct, never seen that in haye to be honest.
oche raises an interesting point re the russians though, would vitali not make the top 25 of all time?
He deff make my top 20 list....he's a great fighter regardless of the current poor era of heavies...
You choose your leaders and place your trust
As their lies put you down and their promises bust
Oche Balboa wrote:Erm i disagree Randall, Lewis was superb but did have the tendency to have a really bad fight
The two defeats were pretty much his own doing.
Hardly trained for both, took both opponents lightly. Same can be said for the Vitali fight tbf, he was a late replacement for what Lewis considered a far easier fight.
You choose your leaders and place your trust
As their lies put you down and their promises bust
Oche Balboa wrote:There were better fighters in the 60s and 70s IMO, as they only had one belt now there are 5 which you could argue devalues it somewhat.
