What job will Ted Hankey do when he finishes his sentence?

[PT13]

Ted’s 2000 world title had arguably a stronger field than the PDC equivalent. Back then he was a legitimate top 3 player in the world.

Better strength in depth in the field at that point, yes. But better than Taylor, Priestley, Manley, Harrington, Burgess, Warriner, Smiffy and a slow rising Part at the top?

[Cooking with Sanchez]

For sure.

[HalloweenJack]

Ted’s 2000 world title had arguably a stronger field than the PDC equivalent. Back then he was a legitimate top 3 player in the world.

Better strength in depth in the field at that point, yes. But better than Taylor, Priestley, Manley, Harrington, Burgess, Warriner, Smiffy and a slow rising Part at the top?

2000 was Hankey at his peak and it could be argued very strongly that he was better (at that time) than all the names you mention with the exception of Taylor.

[PT13]

Ted’s 2000 world title had arguably a stronger field than the PDC equivalent. Back then he was a legitimate top 3 player in the world.

Better strength in depth in the field at that point, yes. But better than Taylor, Priestley, Manley, Harrington, Burgess, Warriner, Smiffy and a slow rising Part at the top?

2000 was Hankey at his peak and it could be argued very strongly that he was better (at that time) than all the names you mention with the exception of Taylor.

I doubt he was better than Priestley, Manley, Harrington or Burgess at that time. Admittedly, Hankey's win over Mason was very impressive.

[sennafan24]

Ted’s 2000 world title had arguably a stronger field than the PDC equivalent. Back then he was a legitimate top 3 player in the world.

Better strength in depth in the field at that point, yes. But better than Taylor, Priestley, Manley, Harrington, Burgess, Warriner, Smiffy and a slow rising Part at the top?

2000 was Hankey at his peak and it could be argued very strongly that he was better (at that time) than all the names you mention with the exception of Taylor.

I doubt he was better than Priestley, Manley, Harrington or Burgess at that time. Admittedly, Hankey's win over Mason was very impressive.

I actually think Priestley's win over Manley was just as, if not more, impressive than Hankey's win over Mason.

[sennafan24]

Ted’s 2000 world title had arguably a stronger field than the PDC equivalent. Back then he was a legitimate top 3 player in the world.

Better strength in depth in the field at that point, yes. But better than Taylor, Priestley, Manley, Harrington, Burgess, Warriner, Smiffy and a slow rising Part at the top?

BDO was probably at its strongest post-split between 2000 and 2004.

The PDC was becoming stronger during those years too though (Skol 6, etc)

[PT13]

Ted’s 2000 world title had arguably a stronger field than the PDC equivalent. Back then he was a legitimate top 3 player in the world.

Better strength in depth in the field at that point, yes. But better than Taylor, Priestley, Manley, Harrington, Burgess, Warriner, Smiffy and a slow rising Part at the top?

2000 was Hankey at his peak and it could be argued very strongly that he was better (at that time) than all the names you mention with the exception of Taylor.

I doubt he was better than Priestley, Manley, Harrington or Burgess at that time. Admittedly, Hankey's win over Mason was very impressive.

I actually think Priestley's win over Manley was just as, if not more, impressive than Hankey's win over Mason.

Absolutely.