Re: Random Dart Stuff
Posted: Sat Mar 30, 2024 11:14 pm
No one is stating otherwise boy
Darts Forum The Darts Forum Darts Forums Darts PDC Darts BDO Darts Darts Players Darts Fans, Talk About Darts Best Double Finishes Phil Taylor Double Finishes darts forum, dartscorner, darts reviews, darts practice tips, buy darts, swap darts, vintage
https://www.thedartsforum.com/
‘Subjective’PT13 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2024 11:13 pmPhil Taylor was the best player in the world at the time of all 16 World Championships that he won. The only really serious debate is Richie Burnett in 1995. The early WDC fields were "comedy" because they had to fight a court case for the survival of long-term professional darts. By the way, nearly all pre-split TV tournament winners were in the early WDC. By "comedy", you're referring to the lack of depth in the field.meetthefeebles wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2024 3:14 amI know you're trolling but I'll bite and agree that what you say is absolutely correct. In a combined field he'd still have probably 10 or so world titles and still be the GOAT, but some of those early PDC fields were absolute comedy.
I reckon Ted would have have still managed to win one.sennafan24 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2024 11:18 pm In a unified field, I suspect Taylor's tally would be between 12 and 14 world titles.
I suspect Headshaker may have caught him out once or twice and in the early rounds.
However, over a long format in particular Taylor was formidable.
04-06 he was vulnerable by his standard but on any given day he could turn it onsennafan24 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2024 11:18 pm In a unified field, I suspect Taylor's tally would be between 12 and 14 world titles.
I suspect Headshaker may have caught him out once or twice and in the early rounds.
However, over a long format in particular Taylor was formidable.
Can't see it.HalloweenJack wrote: ↑Sun Mar 31, 2024 8:21 amI reckon Ted would have have still managed to win one.sennafan24 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2024 11:18 pm In a unified field, I suspect Taylor's tally would be between 12 and 14 world titles.
I suspect Headshaker may have caught him out once or twice and in the early rounds.
However, over a long format in particular Taylor was formidable.
Boxing has multiple world champions. I’ve no issue with 2 world champions in darts.
Stop stealing my argument prickRandall wrote: ↑Sun Mar 31, 2024 8:23 am04-06 he was vulnerable by his standard but on any given day he could turn it onsennafan24 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2024 11:18 pm In a unified field, I suspect Taylor's tally would be between 12 and 14 world titles.
I suspect Headshaker may have caught him out once or twice and in the early rounds.
However, over a long format in particular Taylor was formidable.
As witnessed in the cross code games with Barney at that time
It doesn’t work like that though does it. I suspect Taylor may have had a couple of more shock early defeats. A unified field would have been stronger. It’s all fantasy and we will never know.sennafan24 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 31, 2024 8:31 amCan't see it.HalloweenJack wrote: ↑Sun Mar 31, 2024 8:21 amI reckon Ted would have have still managed to win one.sennafan24 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2024 11:18 pm In a unified field, I suspect Taylor's tally would be between 12 and 14 world titles.
I suspect Headshaker may have caught him out once or twice and in the early rounds.
However, over a long format in particular Taylor was formidable.
Boxing has multiple world champions. I’ve no issue with 2 world champions in darts.
The two years where Ted won Lakeside were 2000 and 2009. Taylor was in formidable form in both of those years.
Hankey's 2000 Lakeside is actually a bit overrated. It was only really in the Mason game where he played exceptionally. It was similar in 2009, just with the Adams semi-final. A lot of solid consistent performances in both campaigns, but nowhere near to what Taylor was producing on the other side of the divide.
I can't see Adams winning any World titles in a unified field either.
I suspect not as someone on here would know plus you would expect to see some newspaper article along the lines of
Too farHalloweenJack wrote: ↑Sun Mar 31, 2024 8:48 amI suspect not as someone on here would know plus you would expect to see some newspaper article along the lines of
‘Disgraced former world darts champion found working in a retail outlet in Leicester’
His boss known as Randall was quoted as saying ‘I know Ted has done wrong in the past, but he is a good worker and the staff and customers love him’
Randall wrote: ↑Sun Mar 31, 2024 8:50 amToo farHalloweenJack wrote: ↑Sun Mar 31, 2024 8:48 amI suspect not as someone on here would know plus you would expect to see some newspaper article along the lines of
‘Disgraced former world darts champion found working in a retail outlet in Leicester’
His boss known as Randall was quoted as saying ‘I know Ted has done wrong in the past, but he is a good worker and the staff and customers love him’
1) In the years mentioned, Taylor was in peak form from pretty much start to finish. He averaged over 101 in every game of those championships, with the exceptions of the 2000 final (94) and the 2009 first round (96). Thus, based on the best evidence, it appears unlikely he would have been tripped up in those years. Other PDC players could have stopped Hankey too (Priestly in 2000, Barney in 2009, etc). I really can't see Hankey winning a world title in an unified field.HalloweenJack wrote: ↑Sun Mar 31, 2024 8:39 am It doesn’t work like that though does it. I suspect Taylor may have had a couple of more shock early defeats. A unified field would have been stronger. It’s all fantasy and we will never know.
Back to Ted, you surely have to give him credit for his demolition of Baxter in the final. He didn’t have to raise his game to another level. If Baxter ( who was a top player back then) had put some pressure on Ted, we might have seen a better version of Hankey.
Over a long format Taylor would have almost certainly have beat Walton in 2001. Over a shorter format I would still pick Taylor, but give Walton a better chance.
Best of 1 leg if he had the throwsennafan24 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 31, 2024 9:00 amOver a long format Taylor would have almost certainly have beat Walton in 2001. Over a shorter format I would still pick Taylor, but give Walton a better chance.
Still, I give Walton a better chance of beating Taylor in 01 than Hankey in 00 or 09.
You are missing the point. I am not saying Ted would have won in 2000 I just think if the split never happened, a lot of things would have been different. For example 1998 Les Wallace could have knocked Taylor out in round 1sennafan24 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 31, 2024 8:55 am1) In the years mentioned, Taylor was in peak form from pretty much start to finish. He averaged over 101 in every game of those championships, with the exceptions of the 2000 final (94) and the 2009 first round (96). Thus, based on the best evidence, it appears unlikely he would have been tripped up in those years. Other PDC players could have stopped Hankey too (Priestly in 2000, Barney in 2009, etc). I really can't see Hankey winning a world title in an unified field.HalloweenJack wrote: ↑Sun Mar 31, 2024 8:39 am It doesn’t work like that though does it. I suspect Taylor may have had a couple of more shock early defeats. A unified field would have been stronger. It’s all fantasy and we will never know.
Back to Ted, you surely have to give him credit for his demolition of Baxter in the final. He didn’t have to raise his game to another level. If Baxter ( who was a top player back then) had put some pressure on Ted, we might have seen a better version of Hankey.
2) Baxter had apparently caught his wife cheating on him around the day of the final and simply didn't turn up. I did credit Hankey for performing consistently and solidly throughout both Lakesides he won. Although Hankey's Lakeside numbers don't really stack up well compared to other Lakeside post-split champions of his era, let alone Taylor's - viewtopic.php?t=10306&hilit=bdo+champio ... 0#p1559898. If anything, there are probably stronger grounds for arguing that Beaton, Fordham or Walton would have still won a world title in a unified field.
I literally posted above that Taylor would probably get caught in the opening rounds a few times.HalloweenJack wrote: ↑Sun Mar 31, 2024 9:13 am You are missing the point. I am not saying Ted would have won in 2000 I just think if the split never happened, a lot of things would have been different. For example 1998 Les Wallace could have knocked Taylor out in round 1
You can’t base everything on averages.
I do think Taylor would certainly be in double figures though for world title wins.